Jeff Laing <jeffla...@gmail.com> added the comment: With all due respect, I think that the 2.7.3 License Page is still being actively used by people as a reference, and it should be accurate. I agree that the code developers can't do anything, but the documentation for all releases, particularly in such a sensitive area as licensing, should be as up to date as possible.
Similarly, the 3.0 License page talks about a "_random" module which presumably is going ahead. It has a license agreement displayed on the web page but I did not see that text copied into the regular LICENSE.txt that is part of the Python3 distribution, and that I assume meets the "supporting documentation" clause that all the module licenses seem to demand. Ditto socket. Ditto asyncore and asynchat. Ditto Cookie. Ditto trace. Ditto xmlrpclib. etcetera. I agree this is all a documentation exercise - perhaps there is another bug tracker I should be reporting it in? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14759> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
