Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Yeah, I know it is technically private. We still tend to keep names > around unless there's a good reason to delete them (like using them > leads to broken code anyway). The code search is some evidence this > deletion would be OK, but why *not* follow Amaury's suggestion?
I don't see the point of maintaining a private API that's proven to be unused :) It's an unwarranted maintenance burden (though admittedly a light one here). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13815> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
