Ray Donnelly <mingw.andr...@gmail.com> added the comment: Hi Éric,
Do you mean this bit?: diff -urN a/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py b/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py --- a/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py 2012-05-30 07:33:00.234438631 +0100 +++ b/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py 2012-05-30 07:33:03.320855811 +0100 @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ return (CONFIG_H_UNCERTAIN, "couldn't read '%s': %s" % (fn, exc.strerror)) -RE_VERSION = re.compile(b'(\d+\.\d+(\.\d+)*)') +RE_VERSION = re.compile(b'[\D\s]*(\d+\.\d+(\.\d+)*)[\D\s]*$') It's hardly touching distutils and only the cygwinccompiler.py part (which I doubt is used very much anyway). It there not some extensive testsuite we can run patches against that would allow distutils changes? I guess the very limited amount of changes I've made to distutils is academic though as it depends on two patches from Roumen Petrov which touch distutils a lot more. I thought that the distutils-is-frozen rule was only for Python 2.x and that they would be allowed for 3.x? Is this not true? Obviously making Python cross compile properly is a very desired feature (in this day and age I'd say cross-compilation for any major software is expected to be honest with you). How can we progress this task in a way that is acceptable? Please advise. Best regards, Ray. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3871> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com