Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> added the comment:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Alexandre Zani <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > I think the easiest and most intuitive approach is to simply define > timestamp() > as being the reverse of fromtimestamp(). I would like to invite everyone to review the discussion leading to closing of issue 2736. We cannot implement "the reverse of fromtimestamp()" because fromtimestamp() is not reversible in presence of DST and because float cannot represent all values that datetime supports. Both issues can be resolved, but I did not see any solution that I would call intuitive. Is anyone motivated enough to port mxDT's ticks() method to datetime? I don't think we need to reinvent the wheel. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14908> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
