anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> added the comment: Eric, you're refering to argument:
> -1 Even if diff.py is not exaclty a diff replacement, it still makes > sense to emulate what's in people's minds. Could you explain it in your own words, because I don't posess the skills to read people's minds. > I really don't find having to type 3 more characters a very convincing > argument. Which basically reads "my argument against is that your argument for is not a convincing argument", which I read as - "ok, your argument is valid - I don't mind, I don't have arguments - I just don't agree". So, Eric, it will help me understand you better it you could state your own opinion and list arguments that are valid for you in your own words. It is easy to be a part of a public opinion, so without explicit arguments it is hard to say if people just follow the majority to get rid of annoyance or really have the point. ---------- status: closed -> languishing _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8355> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
