klappnase <klappn...@web.de> added the comment: I agree that get() should better return a boolean in any case, however the bug then is not one of BooleanVar but rather one of tk.getboolean(). I did some experimenting with get() and it seems that there are three possibilities: getboolean() returns True/False as it should when the variable value was previously set() to anything Tcl accepts as boolean value (like 'yes'/'no', '0'/'1', 'on'/'off', 'true'/'false'). If something which is not a proper Tcl-bool was passed to set() before, getboolean will produce a TclError or TypeError. If set() got 0/1 (as integers) or True/False before, getboolean() will return 0/1 and this appears to me to be the only bug here. But this is not at all a sole BooleanVar bug, e.g.:
>>> root=Tk() >>> root.tk_strictMotif() 0 >>> root.tk_strictMotif(1) 1 You will find this everywhere in Tkinter where getboolean() is used, so I think that rather this should be fixed in _tkinter.c than applying a workaround to BooleanVar.get() and leaving all other uses of getboolean() as they are; even worse, if BooleanVar.set() was changed to accept only True/False and getboolean() left as it is, you could not pass the return value of getboolean() any longer to BooleanVar.get() which would be really bad. As far as set() is concerned, it should at least allow everything that Tcl accepts as boolean, according to http://wiki.tcl.tk/16235 these are at least the above mentioned 'yes'/'no', '0'/'1', 'on'/'off', 'true'/'false' (btw. all of these seem to be ok even case insensitive on the tcl side) plus of course 0/1 and True/False. Otherwise it might break existing code. Terry: "Since the purpose of Variables is to synchronize values between user code and tk, TypeVar().set(x).get() should be x when has the proper type. That is now true for everything but bool/Boolean." But when the input type is not proper you can do e.g.: >>> d = DoubleVar() >>> d.set('1.1') >>> d.get() 1.1 >>> i = IntVar() >>> i.set(True) >>> i.get() 1 >>> I think the Variable classes can also be considered convenience objects that save the application programmer a lot of headaches when they have to convert Python objects into Tcl which usually expects strings, so I think there is nothing wrong with set() accepting "improper" values. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15133> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
