Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> added the comment: > Also, it's not PEP-8-compliant (which we can forgive because I'm pretty sure > it predates PEP 8).
I don't see how this is contrary to PEP 8. PEP 8 says nothing about the names of function arguments. > Already I suspect it is too late. If it ships in 3.3 it will > absolutely be too late. Unfortunately, too little time has passed between #14626 accepting and shipping of 3.3b1. In any case, with accepted #14626 better than without it. > I suggest another approach: add a redundant "follow_symlinks" argument > to os.walk, os.fwalk, and the shutil functions. This is a bad solution, and I do not think that the benefits would outweigh the disadvantages. I am -0. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15202> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com