Glenn Linderman added the comment: Thanks for the patch, Oscar, I've not had more time to follow up on this issue, and haven't yet learned how to generate the patches.
While you dropped the "return False" line, which surprised me, the implicit "return None" is sufficiently false, that there no real concern with the correctness of the code in the patch. Hopefully, with your contribution, this issue can progress to completion. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14565> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
