Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Removing 3.1, since its addition was apparently done by mistake.
Again, I wonder why this is marked release-critical. It's not a regression from previous versions, is it? Please use release-critical only if not making a release at a certain point in the future is better than making the release (despite all the advantages that the release otherwise might have). If you merely think that the issue is "really important" and "should not be forgotten", use "critical" or "high". ---------- nosy: +loewis versions: -Python 3.1 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12834> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
