Andrea Griffini added the comment: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Antoine Pitrou <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Indeed I don't like the introduction of COMPILER_STACK_FRAME_SCALE. > Re-using the existing infrastructure would be much easier to maintain. > The default recursion limit is 1000, which should cover any non-pathological > code, IMHO.
I submitted a new version with the scale lowered to 3. Using a lower value (e.g. 1) however makes "test_extended_args" fail (the test tries to compile an expression with 2500+ terms). If it's ok to make that test to throw instead then the whole scaling could be removed. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5765> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
