Gregory P. Smith added the comment: Yes, something along the lines of that patch is what I was thinking. BTW, this is only necessary for the errpipe_write fd. errpipe_read is for the parent process.
I'm going to do it within _create_pipe so that the optimal _posixsubprocess.cloexec_pipe pipe2() based implementation can be used when possible rather than needing to call _set_cloexec() on the dup'ed fd. There are some recent Linux specific possibilities such as fcntl with F_DUPFD, or better F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, that would make this a single call. Using that may be overkill for this situation but it looks easy enough while I'm in there. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15798> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
