Trent Nelson added the comment: > Since the committed patch is already a step in that direction, > I think it now needs to be completed. It's mandatory (IMO) > that the generated files are actually used; that the generators > are not run if not needed is optional and can be fixed later.
Martin: I'll work on another patch over the next few days and post it here for review. It seems like your comments regarding our options are still valid (despite this thread getting sidetracked): continue with the premise that all generated files get generated in the build directory, and make sure that build directory gets used during the build (i.e. -I./Include). I'll start with that and see how I get on. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15819> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
