Guido van Rossum added the comment: Tough choice. I'm not in favor of using either ctypes or Cython for this purpose -- ctypes because it's brittle, and Cython because it is a huge complicated system of its own that I would rather not depend on. Cython already depends on CPython, so CPython depending on Cython would essentially marry the two systems.
How hard could it be to write a C++ extension wrapping IOCP? From reading the docs there are only a handful API methods (of which the main one stands out as a nadir of API design -- it's like the designers were told they could only add one function... :-). However a bigger problem probably is that it only makes sense if you also wrap the rest of the handle-based I/O functionality on Windows. The docs talk about "overlapping" I/O which I presume is a form of async I/O. Most likely we'll have to look at Mark Hammond's venerable win32 package for that. Maybe it makes most sense to have IOCP integrated there? (For all I know it's already supported...) The main think I want to be sure of is to design the abstract I/O loop (aka reactor) general enough that it will be easy to hook in IOCP-based event-generating and -handling components. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16175> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
