Mark Dickinson added the comment: > I just wanted to ensure that there wouldn't be any bugs by my patch.
Okay, understood. Thanks. Please note that this issue is now closed, though: the 2.3 compatibility workarounds have been dealt with. The use or non-use of dummy_threading has nothing to do with 2.3 compatibility and so is out of scope for the issue. You should feel free to open a new issue if there's a demonstrable problem or demonstrable room for improvement w.r.t. the way dummy threading is handled. (I'm personally not convinced that either of those is true, but others may have different views.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13701> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
