Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: These were not idle questions. I wrote the patch, and I had to know what behavior is correct.
Here's the patch. It fixes potential memory bug (unconsumed_tail sets to NULL in case of out of memory), resets the unconsumed_tail to b'' after EOF, updates unconsumed_tail and unused_data in flush(). I a little changed test for the previous case (here was O(N^2) for large data). I checked it on non-fixed Python, bug was catched. ---------- stage: committed/rejected -> patch review status: closed -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16350> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
