Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: > In the end, it's mostly a wash.
Yes, it's predictable. The gain is too small and undistinguished on a background of random noise. May be more long-running benchmark will show more reliable results, but in any case, the gain is small. My long-running hard-optimized simulation is about 5% faster on 3.2 or patched 3.4 comparing to 3.3. But this is not a typical program. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16465> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
