Thomas Kluyver added the comment:

Thanks, I'm really glad to see that it's useful to others. I don't mind 
contributing it to Python, but I wonder if it's better to let it develop 
separately for a few months first - it's still very new, and I can improve it 
faster in a repository where I can commit to it myself. I'm open to other 
opinions on that, though.

In the meantime, let me know if there are any specific formats/styles/etc. that 
I should work towards, to make a later move into the official docs simpler. I 
have a couple of particular questions:
- The repository includes some utility code for exploring ASTs, as well as 
longer, runnable versions of the examples in the docs. What would be the best 
way to preserve these?
- There are some nodes (like AugLoad) that I've yet to find what they actually 
do, while I've only seen Param in Python 2. Is this an issue?

Of course, you're more than welcome to give a 'see also' link to GTS if we 
decide not to move it for now.

----------
nosy: +takluyver

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16544>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to