Chris Jerdonek added the comment: > The "consisting" doesn't sound too well to me, maybe "reserved to"?
"Reserved for" sounds good to me. Originally I was thinking of "limited to" or "restricted to," but that had a connotation of exclusivity I wanted to avoid. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16581> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
