New submission from julien tayon: Priority: low Keywords: documentation
After watching http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9pEzgHorH0 (Stop writing classes by diedrich) I think the class Point example for the named tuples may be a wrong practice: http://docs.python.org/2/library/collections.html#collections.namedtuple Since complex basic types 1* does the same, (if x is real and y is imag) 2* does more (rotation, norms, symbolic notation with i) At my opnion pointing some code to http://bugs.python.org/issue1818 (if it is accepted) may be the case of use of the named tuple. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 177382 nosy: docs@python, julien.tayon priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: [docs] class Point in collections.namedtuples may be not that good example versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16670> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
