Mark Dickinson added the comment:
> The only difference with previous code is that now OverflowError raised > for
> large bases instead of ValueError.
Serhiy: can you clarify this remark? Where do you see the OverflowError? The
current exception and message look fine to me, so maybe I'm misunderstanding
what you're talking about:
Python 3.4.0a0 (default:1b2134a78c17, Dec 28 2012, 10:06:47)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> int('34', base=2**100)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: int() base must be >= 2 and <= 36
[66206 refs, 23451 blocks]
I actually think this issue can be closed as fixed: the current code looks
fine to me, and I don't think the fix should be backported.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16772>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
