Matthew Barnett added the comment:
I've attached a patch.
It now reports an invalid literal as-is:
>>> int("#\N{ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE}")
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#1>", line 1, in <module>
int("#\N{ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE}")
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '#١'
>>> int("foo\x00bar")
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#2>", line 1, in <module>
int("foo\x00bar")
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'foo\x00bar'
There's a slight difference in that it truncates to 200 codepoints, not 200
UTF-8 bytes.
----------
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28487/issue16741.patch
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16741>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
