Chris Jerdonek added the comment: I admit that I'm used to the alphabetical listing, but I like the idea for this organization. In fact, it's similar to how the Built-in Types page is organized: grouped by similarity rather than listed alphabetically.
Also just a note: strictly speaking there are built-in types not in the built-in types section (e.g. staticmethod and classmethod), but I think that's okay. (There can be a disclaimer to this effect in the intro sentences of the first grouping.) Lastly, it might also be worth grouping the built-in types into subgroups (similar to how they're done for Built-in Types). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16927> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
