New submission from Nickolai Zeldovich:

Modules/_sre.c relies on pointer overflow in 5 places to check that the 
supplied offset does not cause wraparound when added to a base pointer; e.g.:

                    SRE_CODE prefix_len;
                    GET_ARG; prefix_len = arg;
                    GET_ARG;
                    /* Here comes the prefix string */
                    if (code+prefix_len < code || code+prefix_len > newcode)
                        FAIL;

however, pointer wraparound is undefined behavior in C, and gcc will optimize 
away (code+prefix_len < code) to (true), since prefix_len is an unsigned value. 
 This will happen with -O2 and even with -fwrapv:

nickolai@sahara:/tmp$ cat x.c
void bar();

void
foo(int *p, unsigned int x)
{
  if (p + x < p)
    bar();
}
nickolai@sahara:/tmp$ gcc x.c -S -o - -O2 -fwrapv
...
foo:
.LFB0:
        .cfi_startproc
        rep
        ret
        .cfi_endproc
...
nickolai@sahara:/tmp$ 

On a 32-bit platform with the development version of cpython, prefix_len seems 
to end up being an 'unsigned int', so I suspect that supplying a large 
prefix_len value (perhaps 0xffffffff) could lead to the subsequent loop writing 
garbage all over memory, or worse (but I have not tried to construct a concrete 
input that triggers this bug, so maybe there are some checks that make it 
difficult to trigger the bug).

In any case, this might be worth fixing -- the attached patch provides one 
proposed fix.  Another option might be to add -fno-strict-overflow to the gcc 
flags, which may be a reasonable additional measure to take, to avoid such 
problems biting Python in the future, but I would suggest doing this in 
addition to fixing the code (since not all compilers support such a flag to 
disable certain optimizations).

----------
components: None
files: pp.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 180403
nosy: Nickolai.Zeldovich
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: _sre: avoid relying on pointer overflow
type: security
versions: Python 3.5
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28804/pp.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17016>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to