Gili T. added the comment:

I read http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-August/121460.html and 
I believe they are wrong.

I have personally run into these problems (each library maintaining its own CRT 
with separate heaps, file handles, etc) when static linking was used, but when 
dynamic linking is used there is only one CRT instance and therefore you only 
end up with one heap, set of file handles, etc. I've never seen the kind of 
problems you're referring to if dynamic linking is used.

My guess is that someone (Python or an extension) is using static linking which 
is causing these problems. Is that a reasonable assumption?

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17058>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to