R. David Murray added the comment: I would be very careful trying to reason by analogy there. ==, is, and javascripts === are rather different in detail, from what I understand. Nor do I see what javascript has to do with this issue :)
As far as the remaining documentation issue here, IMO to follow the convention used most often in the docs (and docstrings), the text in Chris' example should read: If *allow_nan* is true That is, drop the code markup and capitalization to indicate that any true value is accepted. A naive user will use True, a non-naive user will understand the implication. I know Ezio doesn't think this is worthwhile, but I disagree :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4945> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
