mirabilos added the comment:
Serhiy Storchaka dixit:
>mirabilos, if you are motivated enough, do the following. Compile two
>Python executables - one with deleted assert, and second with deleted
>a block between "#if SIZEOF_LONG <= SIZEOF_VOID_P" and "#endif". Run
>following microbenchmarks for both executables:
>
>./python -m timeit -s "x=b'A'*10000" "x.decode('ascii')"
>./python -m timeit -s "x=b'A'*10000" "x.decode('utf-8')"
>
>----------
>
>_______________________________________
>Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
><http://bugs.python.org/issue17237>
>_______________________________________
Thanks, will actually do that, just not before the weekend,
dayjob’s keeping me busy, and I need to be careful to not
burn out myself in the evening too.
Which tree should I build? A release (if so, which)? Or
some CVS branch?
Do note we clock at roughly 1000 pystones for the fastest
machines… yes 1000 not 10000.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much
*much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't
wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17237>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
