Ezio Melotti added the comment: > I doubt about '\ud83d\udc9d' on wide build. Is it right to encode it as > b'💝' and not as b'��'?
I don't think so. IIRC surrogates are invalid in UTF-32, and certainly shouldn't be recombined. > This will be compatible with narrow build but will break compatibility > with 3.3+. What is less evil? I think it's better to be compatible with 3.3+. This is anyway a rather obscure corner case. Do you want to propose a new patch? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15866> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
