Ezio Melotti added the comment: > Why is it important to remove subclassing object?
It's not /important/, but those are just leftovers from 2.x, and there's no reason to keep them around. > Isn't it still good form to mention object as a base class. I don't think so (or at least I've never seen anyone suggesting to keep or add "object" explicitly). The patch LGTM, so unless there's a valid reason to keep the "object" around I'll commit it soon. ---------- nosy: +ezio.melotti _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17351> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
