Richard Oudkerk added the comment: > Which does give me a thought - perhaps lru_cache in 3.4 could accept a > "key" argument that is called as "key(*args, **kwds)" to derive the cache > key? (that would be a separate issue, of course)
Agreed. I suggested the same in an earlier post. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16389> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
