Zack Weinberg added the comment: Note also that allowing `stdin=<any filelike>` in a clean fashion would require rather more surgery than you suggest, because a filelike can produce an infinite stream of data, and people would expect that to work when the subprocess only reads a finite prefix; making it *actually* work would involve teaching communicate() to take a filelike and copy blocks into the pipe. I have no *objection* to that change but I think it is too much mission creep for this proposal.
With the present design, where stdin= has to be something for which fileno() is defined, and input= has to be a string (hence of finite length), no one is going to expect something to work that won't. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16624> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
