paul j3 added the comment: Yes, http://bugs.python.org/msg166175 does use 'parse_args' in the second call. But I think things would be more flexible if we had a second function:
def parse_???(self, args=None, namespace=None): args, argv = self.parse_intermixed_args(args, namespace) if argv: msg = _('unrecognized arguments: %s') self.error(msg % ' '.join(argv)) return args But then what would a be a good pair of names? parse??? and parse_intermixed_args versus parse_intermixed_args and parse_known_intermixed_args or something else? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14191> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com