Xavier de Gaye added the comment: > Deciding what's best to do at this point without breaking existent > code is not easy, that is why I think that on python <= 3.3 we > should fix *asynchat* in order to take EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK into > account and leave asyncore's recv() alone.
IMHO for all python versions, asynchat should be fixed and recv() left unchanged raising OSError with EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK. With the proposed change on recv(), asyncore users would need to handle this new None returned value anyway, instead of handling the exception which is much more explicit. The attached patch does this on the default branch. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30193/EWOULDBLOCK.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16133> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
