Bob Ippolito added the comment: The patch that I wrote for simplejson is here (it differs a bit from serhiy's patch): https://github.com/simplejson/simplejson/commit/35816bfe2d0ddeb5ddcc68239683cbb35b7e3ff2
I discovered another bug along the way in the pure-Python scanstring, int(s, 16) will parse '0xNN' when json expects only strings of the form 'NNNN' to work. I fixed that along with this issue by explicitly checking for x or X. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17906> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
