Richard Oudkerk added the comment:

Given that the change could only be made to 3.4, and we already have 
concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor, I am not sure there is much point to 
such a change now.

----------
nosy: +sbt

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17140>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to