Richard Oudkerk added the comment: > This could solve the waiting problem for the "thread", but also may > keep the other Condition objs waiting -- and that may not be problem > because I'm already using .notify_all()
I don't understand what you mean. > Probably this function have more use cases than my original idea, but > is it simple to wait on several locks? It would be for waiting for several conditions associated with the same lock, not for waiting for several locks. > It could be in the form: > > Condition.wait_for_any(cond_to_pred: dict|list, timeout=None) -> condition > > For cases when there's no need for a predicate function. There is always a need for a predicate function. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18078> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
