Vinay Sajip added the comment:

How about the following?

1. Paul updates the patch to include .pyw files, but also puts all the 
functionality of this patch in #if defined(SCRIPT_WRAPPER).
2. SCRIPT_WRAPPER is left undefined in the launcher Visual Studio project, so 
it will build identically to how it does now.
3. Once the dust has settled on distutils-sig, and we know for sure what we 
need for script wrappers, we add a separate Visual Studio project to the Python 
solution which defines SCRIPT_WRAPPER and puts the built files in whatever  
destination is appropriate.

This will give the benefit that we can reuse common functionality at the source 
code level, without changing the existing behaviour of py.exe/pyw.exe.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18491>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to