New submission from Wes Turner: random.shuffle [1][2] could be faster.
``xrange(10,1,-1)`` is faster than ``reversed(xrange(1,10))``. [1] http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/v3.3.2/Lib/random.py#l254 [2] http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/v2.7.5/Lib/random.py#l276 ---------- components: Library (Lib) files: random-shuffle_v2.7.5_timeit.py messages: 193388 nosy: westurner priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: random.shuffle could be faster type: performance versions: 3rd party, Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30983/random-shuffle_v2.7.5_timeit.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18511> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
