João Bernardo added the comment: > Charles-François's point about the algorithmic complexity is > legitimate, so I think he was actually waiting for you to amend > your patch ;)
This doesn't seems to be the actual issue as it would require a big change for something that wasn't proven important... The old behavior is still O(1) in the new implementation. I might change that, but can someone give me an actual idea to implement that? Also, this can be done on another patch. ** The real problem ** I pointed out one issue about which conditions should be considered when waking up and there was no answer: http://bugs.python.org/msg190556 Also, Richard Oudkerk wrote he was expecting "wait_for_any() return a list": http://bugs.python.org/msg190597 I need to get feedback about the first one to change the second one. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18078> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
