Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > > But how is that necessary for the use case? Your LoggerAdapter- > > derived class could take the "existing class" as a constructor > > parameter (*), then inject the required info in its overriden > > process() method. > > If you can adapt an existing class to look sufficiently like a dict, > that's all you need to do - there's no need to subclass > LoggerAdapter and override process(). There might be cases where > that's the easier option.
I am not talking about "adapting a class". I am taking about overriding process() to do the adapting in a simpler way than in your example. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18541> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
