Vinay Sajip added the comment: I suggest that the declarative configuration approach of logging.config.dictConfig() be used for configurations which can't be handled by basicConfig().
I don't propose to enhance the Handler API as suggested, as at the very least every handler would need to be changed to accommodate the new kwarg. Also, this isn't going to work for third-party handlers which are out there already, since they won't necessarily recognise a new kwarg. ---------- nosy: +vinay.sajip resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> pending _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18689> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
