Mark Dickinson added the comment: Ah, Tim saw through my cunningly-laid false trail of incorrect issue numbers. Step 1 of my world domination plan is foiled!
Yes, let's fix this. In my mind, it's definitely a bug that ints and longs aren't interchangeable here, and it would be nice to have 2.7 and 3.x behaving the same way. I do have some worries about the fix breaking / changing existing code, but given that it'll only affect log of a long, those worries barely register. ---------- type: -> behavior _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18739> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
