Nick Coghlan added the comment: Using tulip-inspired method names (when tulip hasn't landed) to duplicate existing data input functionality (feed() and close()) seems a rather dubious design decision to me.
Given how popular lxml.etree is as an alternative to the standard library's etree implementation, we shouldn't dismiss Stefan's design concerns lightly. ---------- nosy: +ncoghlan _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17741> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
