Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: It's likely that asyncore won't be able to take any practical advantage from this integration.
To say one, epoll()/kqueue() pollers won't bring any speedup over select()/poll() because of how asyncore.loop() function is implemented (see http://bugs.python.org/issue6692#msg103628 and http://bugs.python.org/issue11273). Also, the new selectors module only takes read and write events into account, whereas asyncore explicitly closes dispatcher in case of disconnection events (POLLOUT, etc). In summary I'd say it's a lot wiser to leave asyncore alone and consider it frozen. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18923> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
