Jakub Stasiak added the comment: Antoine: I agree that it does look weird to have thousands separators at one place and not at the other but IMO it's still slightly better - the number formatted with separators is simply more readable that separator-less one.
R. David Murray: what's the acceptable separator then? Modifying it to be locale-aware would make it inconsistent with the rest of the output (which, admittedly, is also the case with introducing space separator, dot still is the fraction separator though). I modified my patch to not have the separators at all, please find timeit-v3-actual-changes-no-separators.patch - if that's the condition for accepting this patch then so be it - the description of the patch would be "print number of loops per second" and the example output is: 10000 loops, best of 3: 34.6 usec per loop (28870 loops/s) ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31786/timeit-v3-actual-changes-no-separators.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18975> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
