Augie Fackler added the comment:

On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:

> Glyph Lefkowitz added the comment:
> 
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> 
>> What proposal is actually on the table here?
> 
> Sorry Eric, you're right, there is too much discussion here.  This issue 
> ought to be about .format, like the title says.  There should be a separate 
> ticket for %-formatting, since it seems to be an almost wholly unrelated 
> task.  While I'm sympathetic to Mercurial's issues, they're somewhat 
> different from Twisted's, in that we're willing to adopt the "one new way" to 
> do things in order to achieve compatibility whereas that would be too hard 
> for Mercurial.

Yeah, my bad too. I suppose I should add a new bug for %-formatting on bytes 
objects?

Note that for hg, we can't drop Python 2.6 or so (we'll only drop *2.4* if we 
can do 2.6 and some 3.x from a single source tree) for a while, due to 
supporting the system interpreter on a variety of LTS platforms.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3982>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to