Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Based on the discussion so far, I'm going to close this one. I don't think it is an appropriate use of sets (they are about membership testing, not about looking up values).
The upside is minimal. The downside is hacking up the set implementation and making it more difficult to implement some of the other alterations I'm planning for sets -- I want to tune the performance to optimize set operations without worrying about slowing down all the rest of Python because of interned strings. Martin's reason's for rejecting this previously still hold true. ---------- resolution: -> rejected status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19187> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
