Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Amaury, please do revert 60189. There is no reason to destabalize this code, slow it down, and introduce new dependencies.
Use of the with-statement is not in and of itself a "best practice". Where it really shines is in factoring-away repeated setup/teardown code. Modules that serve as elemental building blocks (like threading, Queue, heapq, etc) need to have fast, clean code with as few dependencies as possible. Also, we should change/modernize something like asyncore or threading with a great deal of care and restraint. It is too easy to introduce hard to find bugs in this code. It took a long time for this code to stabalize and we should enjoy the benefits of its maturity. __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1910> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
