Brett Cannon added the comment: Attached is a script to verify that PEP 451 works as desired, so Python 3.5 doesn't have any technical blockers for doing a lazy loader for PEP 451 loaders.
And with __spec__.loader_state it might be possible to work things out through a common API to work around issue #18275 so that relying on super() and doing this as a mixin goes away and instead just somehow store the final loader on the spec (e.g. loader's constructor just takes a spec so that you can instantiate the actual loader, reset __loader__ & __spec__.loader, and then proceed with exec_module()). ---------- dependencies: -Implementation for PEP 451 (importlib.machinery.ModuleSpec) Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file33136/lazy_test.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17621> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
