STINNER Victor added the comment: > With debug code the execution time is around 2.8-3.1s, with debug comment > commented out it's around 2.3-2.4s.
Wow, that's impressive that such minor syscalls can take so much times! I modified your script to repeat the test 5 times and take the minimum timing: * Python 3.4 original: 3.83 seconds * asyncio without timing log: 2.79 seconds (27% faster) 27% faster is not a "premature" optimisation :-) By the way, Linux provides faster clocks like CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE: A faster but less precise version of CLOCK_MONOTONIC. Use when you need very fast, but not fine-grained time‐ stamps. Python doesn't expose these clock identifiers yet: #14555. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20275> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
