Larry Hastings added the comment:
inspect.signature(object) works fine in my (not yet posted) latest #20189 patch.
inspect.signature(type) doesn't work, because it's not clear what the signature
for type should be. There's the one-argument and three-argument approaches.
This is technically true:
"(object_or_name, [bases, dict])"
However,
a) it's painful to look at,
b) I can't communicate the idea of an "optional group" in an inspect.Signature
object right now (although I guess we're going to hash that out somewhere,
which is good).
If we can agree on a good signature for inspect.signature(type), I can make it
happen.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20308>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
